Members
of the Loring Heights and Brookwood neighborhoods hoped their meeting at the
Masonic Temple on Peachtree Road today
with Georgia Department of Transportation officials would result in
delaying conflicting Buckhead road projects this summer.
But
at the end of the meeting, residents were unsuccessful in putting the brakes on
the plans of GDOT and the city who held fast to their concurrent construction
schedules to the two projects, according to reports by the Buckhead Reporter
and Buckhead Patch.
The
two projects will both begin in the July and August timeframe and will disrupt
east-west traffic between Northside Drive and Peachtree Road for all of the
summer, with the Northside Drive project continuing for 24 months.
GDOT
and city of Atlanta officials did promise to be responsive to residents’
concerns and complaints and to attempt to provide enough detour and directional signage to minimize traffic
headaches.
The
meeting was held just across Deering Road from the Amtrak Station, the site of
one of two projects. Residents have been
baffled why that project was scheduled at the precise time that work
will begin on a two-year water line and roadwork project on nearby Northside
Drive.
For BuckheadView's earlier story of the meeting of GDOT and city officials with the Buckhead Council of Neighborhoods last week, go to http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4861583808069812520#editor/target=post;postID=6785762610417243244.
For BuckheadView's earlier story of the meeting of GDOT and city officials with the Buckhead Council of Neighborhoods last week, go to http://www.blogger.com/blogger.g?blogID=4861583808069812520#editor/target=post;postID=6785762610417243244.
For
the Buckhead Reporter’s story on the Wednesday meeting go to /http://www.reporternewspapers.net/2012/06/20/buckhead-council-of-neighborhoods-loring-heights-cant-sway-gdot/.
For
Buckhead Patch’s coverage of the meeting go to /http://buckhead.patch.com/articles/buckhead-transportation-meeting-results-changes-needed.
So... the two projects are? A bit of context would have gone a long way.
ReplyDelete